Title
Expression analysis on archival material revisited : isolation and quantification of RNA extracted from FFPE samples Expression analysis on archival material revisited : isolation and quantification of RNA extracted from FFPE samples
Author
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Publication type
article
Publication
New York, N.Y. ,
Subject
Chemistry
Biology
Human medicine
Engineering sciences. Technology
Source (journal)
The American journal of surgical pathology: diagnostic molecular pathology: part B. - New York, N.Y.
Volume/pages
22(2013) :1 , p. 59-64
ISSN
1052-9551
ISI
000314886100009
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Affiliation
University of Antwerp
Abstract
Background: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most readily available source of RNA for the gene expression studies. The main disadvantage is the poor quality of isolated RNA. Our group recently compared 5 commercially available RNA isolation kits and concluded that the RNeasy FFPE kit from Qiagen was the most appropriate one. However, this kit has been discontinued and replaced by a new version. In this study both kits were compared, and spectrophotometric and fluorometric analyses for quantification of RNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue. Methods: Both RNeasy FFPE kits were compared for the total RNA and DNA yields, purity, and raw cycle threshold. Quantity and quality of the isolated RNA was measured using the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer and Qubit 2.0 fluorometer. Results: The average concentration of RNA extracted from FFPE tissue measured using the NanoDrop was 32.0%±9.5% higher than the concentration measured using the Qubit. When measuring an RNA sample extracted from a cell line, the concentration measured using both methods was similar. When comparing both RNeasy FFPE kits, marginal differences were observed for total RNA yield, purity, and raw cycle threshold. However, the residual DNA in the samples isolated using the old kit was higher than in the samples isolated using the new kit. Conclusions: A fluorometric analysis is more suitable for quantification of RNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue compared with spectrophotometric analysis. For RNA isolation from FFPE tissue, both old and new RNeasy FFPE kits were adequate. The new kit resulted in more efficient DNA removal.
E-info
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000314886100009&DestLinkType=RelatedRecords&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000314886100009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000314886100009&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
Handle