Title
|
|
|
|
Disadvantageous decision-making as a predictor of drop-out among cocaine-dependent individuals in long-term residential treatment
| |
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Background: The treatment of cocaine-dependent individuals (CDI) is substantially challenged by high drop-out rates, raising questions regarding contributing factors. Recently, a number of studies have highlighted the potential of greater focus on the clinical significance of neurocognitive impairments in treatment-seeking cocaine users. In the present study, we hypothesized that disadvantageous decision-making would be one such factor placing CDI at greater risk for treatment drop-out. Methods: In order to explore this hypothesis, the present study contrasted baseline performance (at treatment onset) on two validated tasks of decision-making, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Cambridge Gamble Task (CGT) in CDI who completed treatment in a residential Therapeutic Community (TC) (N = 66) and those who dropped out of TC prematurely (N = 84). Results: Compared to treatment completers, CDI who dropped out of TC prematurely did not establish a consistent and advantageous response pattern as the IGT progressed and exhibited a poorer ability to choose the most likely outcome on the CGT. There were no group differences in betting behavior. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that neurocognitive rehabilitation of disadvantageous decision-making may have clinical benefits in CDI admitted to long-term residential treatment programs. |
| |
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Frontiers in psychiatry / Frontiers Research Foundation (Lausanne, Switzerland) - Lausanne, 2010, currens
| |
Publication
|
|
|
|
Lausanne
:
Frontiers Research Foundation
,
2013
| |
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1664-0640
| |
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.3389/FPSYT.2013.00149
| |
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
4
:11
(2013)
, p. 1-9
| |
Article Reference
|
|
|
|
149
| |
Medium
|
|
|
|
E-only publicatie
| |
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
| |
|