Publication
Title
The fictionality debate and the complex texts of Richard Powers and William T. Vollmann
Author
Abstract
Narratological discussions about the distinction between fiction and nonfiction predominantly focus on an opposition between narrative pragmatics and narrative semantics. The former position holds that fictionality depends on the authors intention to present the text as fiction or nonfiction, whereas the latter implies that readers assign texts to one of these two categories depending on text-immanent features. This essay suggests that crossings of the border between fiction and nonfiction are the result of both author intention and reader reception. By considering recent theories on the relation between authors and readers, I submit that the distinction between real-life author and fictional narrator is not always clear-cut. The narrative discourse in the novels by Richard Powers, for example, can at times be taken for real-world discourse. Similarly, William T. Vollmanns nonfictional work Imperial continuously suggests that facts are informed by the fictions we tell ourselves. The distinction between nonfiction and fiction arguably no longer functions as a global interpretative frame for these texts, which can be read at times as fiction, at times as nonfiction.
Language
English
Source (journal)
Neophilologus: an international journal devoted to modern and mediaeval language and literature, including general linguistics, literary theory and comparative literature. - Groningen
Publication
Groningen : 2014
ISSN
0028-2677
Volume/pages
98:2(2014), p. 177-192
ISI
000333159200001
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
UAntwerpen
Faculty/Department
Research group
Publication type
Subject
Affiliation
Publications with a UAntwerp address
External links
Web of Science
Record
Identification
Creation 09.05.2014
Last edited 07.08.2017
To cite this reference