Publication
Title
Does the choice of well-being measure matter empirically? An illustration with German data
Author
Abstract
We discuss and compare five measures of individual well-being, namely income, an objective composite well-being index, a measure of subjective well-being, equivalent income, and a well-being measure based on the von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities of the individuals. After examining the information requirements of these measures, we illustrate their implementation using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) for 2010. We find sizeable differences in the characteristics of the individuals identified as worst off according to the different well-being measures. Less than 1% of the individuals belong to the bottom decile according to all five measures. Moreover, the measures lead to considerably different wellbeing rankings of the individuals. These findings highlight the importance of the choice of well-being measure for policy making.
Language
English
Source (series)
IZA discussion paper ; 8589
Publication
Bonn : Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, 2014
Volume/pages
41 p.
Full text (open access)
UAntwerpen
Faculty/Department
Research group
Publication type
Subject
Affiliation
Publications with a UAntwerp address
External links
Record
Identification
Creation 09.12.2014
Last edited 11.12.2014
To cite this reference