Publication
Title
A perfect match? The impact of statement selection on voting advice applications' ability to match voters and parties
Author
Abstract
This study examines how statement selection systematically affects the output of voting advice applications (VAAs). Does the statement selection influence how often voters are matched with parties that 'should be' close to them? Our benchmark is a classic account of issue voting, the proximity left-right model. We analyze the Belgian VAA Do the Vote Test and find that the output resembles the left-right model. When more left-right statements are included, more left-wing voters get the advice to vote for left-wing parties and the same is true on the right, while simultaneously advantaging parties with more extreme positions on this dimension. We also analyze issue saliency and find that parties are disadvantaged when more statements about salient issues are included. These findings imply tough choices for VAA builders. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Language
English
Source (journal)
Electoral studies. - Guildford
Publication
Guildford : 2014
ISSN
0261-3794
Volume/pages
36(2014), p. 252-262
ISI
000347600500027
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Full text (publishers version - intranet only)
UAntwerpen
Faculty/Department
Research group
Publication type
Subject
Law 
Affiliation
Publications with a UAntwerp address
External links
Web of Science
Record
Identification
Creation 13.03.2015
Last edited 21.05.2017
To cite this reference