Biophysical drivers of the carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a short-rotation poplar coppiceBiophysical drivers of the carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a short-rotation poplar coppice
Faculty of Sciences. Biology
Plant and Vegetation Ecology (PLECO)
Agricultural and forest meteorology. - Amsterdam
209(2015), p. 22-35
University of Antwerp
We used the eddy-covariance technique to measure the temporal dynamics and the relationships between leaf area index (LAI) and exchanges of carbon dioxide (CO2), latent heat (LE) and sensible heat (H) in a multi-genotype short-rotation poplar coppice (SRC) located in East-Flanders (Belgium). The study was carried out over four years (20102013) corresponding to the first two rotations of the plantation. The net carbon (C) balance during the first two-year rotation was 75.2 (±4.4) g C m−2 in the establishment year 2010 and −95.6 (±5.9) g C m−2 in 2011. After the harvest (second two-year rotation) the coppice was a net source of carbon, 151.0 (±10.5) g C m−2 in 2012, but a sink of −274.6 (±18.8) g C m−2 in 2013. Overall, at the end of the second rotation this SRC, was a net CO2 sink with a cumulative uptake of −144.0 (±22.8) g C m−2. The temporal dynamics and the magnitude of the ratio between gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) were similar to a deciduous forest. The evolution of LAI showed values ranging from 0.96 (±0.4) to 2.0 (±1.2) and from 5.1 (±1.5) to 4.5 (±0.84) during the first and the second rotation, respectively. The GPP (measured close to light saturation) was significantly related to LAI (r2 of 0.76, p < 0.001). The cumulative evapotranspiration (ET) measured during the first rotation was 241.7 mm and 349.9 mm for 2010 and 2011, respectively, and 464.6 mm and 372.1 mm for 2012 and 2013. The average value of surface conductance (Gs) was 0.35 mol m−2 s−1 and 0.24 mol m−2 s−1 for the foliated and unfoliated periods, respectively. The mean decoupling factors (Ω) were 0.35 and 0.23 for the foliated and unfoliated periods, respectively, indicating that ET was primarily controlled by vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and Gs (a well-coupled system). The mean PriestleyTaylor coefficient (α) was 0.77 and 0.53 for the foliated and the unfoliated periods, respectively. Such low values indicate that ET was significantly lower than the equilibrium evaporation and thus also lower than the ET of a hypothetical reference crop. During the whole experiment only two short episodes of drought were identified when in MayJune 2011 and June 2013 the evaporative fraction dropped below 0.4. The analysis of Gs showed a rather low stomatal control (anisohydric stomatal response) that put the poplar SRC at greater risk during severe drought conditions. All the three mentioned parameters related to ET and GPP (Gs, Ω and α) were significantly and positively correlated to LAI (r2 from 0.14 to 0.2, p < 0.0001), suggesting that LAI was the main biophysical driver controlling the carbon and water balances in this bioenergy production system.