|
Title
|
|
|
|
Is primary percutaneous coronary intervention still the superior reperfusion strategy?
|
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
|
|
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
JAMA internal medicine / American Medical Association. - Chicago, Ill., 2013, currens
|
|
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Ill.
:
2015
|
|
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
2168-6106
[print]
2168-6114
[online]
|
|
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2014.6586
|
|
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
175
:2
(2015)
, p. 216-217
|
|
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000349120100018
|
|
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
|
|
|
|
|
|