Title
Perception as something we do Perception as something we do
Author
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Arts. Philosophy
Publication type
article
Publication
Thoverton ,
Subject
Philosophy
Linguistics
Source (journal)
Journal of consciousness studies. - Thoverton, 1994, currens
Volume/pages
23(2016) :5-6 , p. 80-104
ISSN
1355-8250
2051-2201
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Affiliation
University of Antwerp
Abstract
In this paper, I want to focus on the claim, prominently made by sensorimotor theorists, that perception is something we do. I will argue that understanding perceiving as a bodily doing allows for a strong non-dualistic position on the relation between experience and objective physical events, one which provides insight into why such relation seems problematic while at the same time providing means to relieve the tension. Next I will show how the claim that perception is something we do does not stand in opposition to, and is not refuted by, the fact that we often have perceptual experience without moving. In arguing that cases of motionless perception and perception-like experience are still doings it will be pointed out that the same interactive regularities which are engaged in in active perception still apply to them. Explaining how past interactive regularities can influence current perception or perception-like experience in a way which remains true to the idea that perception is a doing, so I will argue, can be done by invoking the past -- the past itself, however, not its representation. The resulting historical, non-representational sensorimotor approach can join forces with Gibsonian ecological psychology -- provided that such is also understood along lines that don't invoke externalist remnants of contents.
E-info
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/iruaauth/dcf110/133830.pdf
Handle