Title
Postural sway in children : a literature review Postural sway in children : a literature review
Author
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Sciences. Biology
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Publication type
article
Publication
Clare :Elsevier ireland ltd ,
Subject
Sociology
Economics
Human medicine
Source (journal)
Gait and posture. - Oxford
Volume/pages
49(2016) , p. 402-410
ISSN
0966-6362
ISI
000384858400068
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Affiliation
University of Antwerp
Abstract
Background and aim Static posturography can serve as an easy and fast way to determine whether a child possesses sufficient balance control in different sensory conditions. Therefore, the aim of this review is to map age-related differences in postural sway during childhood in typically developing children, using static posturography and to provide an overview of the available (age-specific) reference values in scientific literature. Methods The search strategy was performed in five databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Clinical Trials, Medline (Ovid)) November 2nd 2014 and updated twice: March 16th 2015 and July 20th 2015. The following keywords were used: (children OR child) AND (postural control OR postural stability OR equilibrium OR posture OR postural balance[mesh]) AND (quiet stance OR standing OR stance OR quiet stance OR static) AND (postural sway OR posturography OR body sway OR stabilography OR trunk sway OR medio-lateral sway OR antero-posterior sway). Relevant studies were identified using predefined selection criteria, applied on title and abstract (phase 1) and on full text (phase 2), supplemented with reference screening after the second phase. Results A total of 14 studies met the criteria. This review showed three main findings: 1) during natural bipedal stance with the eyes open, all studies reported a decrease in postural sway with increasing age, with conflicting results on the (non-)linearity of its development, 2) with eyes closed, all children show more sway than with eyes open and 3) only four studies reported numeric sway values that could serve as reference values, mainly focusing on children aged five and older. Conclusion Considerable disagreement exists on the (non-)linearity of the development of postural sway in children. By choosing arbitrary age categories, it remains unclear between which age groups differences are situated. Future research is necessary to determine for which age groups age-specific reference values are relevant.
E-info
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/iruaauth/d91272/134838.pdf
Full text (open access)
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/1dabdd/134838.pdf
Handle