Title
|
|
|
|
The art institution in a globalizing world
| |
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
Abstract
|
|
|
|
How do classical big art institutions (museums, the ballet, the opera, symphony orchestras) react to phenomena of globalization such as migration flows, the denationalization of artistic movements, the enormous growth of the number of artists, the trend of a global cultural branding of cities, etc.? And which cultural policies do governments develop to interfere in the relationship between those art institutions and their changing environments? Those were the central questions I asked while doing research about the position of art institutions in society today. The research concentrated on a very diverse sample of big art institutions in Europe. The research begins with the insights of Actor Network Theory and the political philosophy of Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt and leads to an ideal typical two-dimensional model to classify the possible strategies that such institutions and their responsible governments can use on the local, national and international level. |
| |
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Journal of arts management, law, and society. - Washington, D.C., 1992, currens
| |
Publication
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C.
:
2010
| |
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1063-2921
[print]
1930-7799
[online]
| |
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1080/10632921.2010.525065
| |
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
40
:4
(2010)
, p. 279-296
| |
ISI
|
|
|
|
000284904400004
| |
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
|
|
|
|
| |
|