|
Title
|
|
|
|
Evaluating random mutant selection at class-level in projects with non-adequate test suites
|
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| Mutation testing is a standard technique to evaluate the quality of a test suite. Due to its computationally intensive nature, many approaches have been proposed to make this technique feasible in real case scenarios. Among these approaches, uniform random mutant selection has been demonstrated to be simple and promising. However, works on this area analyze mutant samples at project level mainly on projects with adequate test suites. In this paper, we fill this lack of empirical validation by analyzing random mutant selection at class level on projects with non-adequate test suites. First, we show that uniform random mutant selection underachieves the expected results. Then, we propose a new approach named weighted random mutant selection which generates more representative mutant samples. Finally, we show that representative mutant samples are larger for projects with high test adequacy. |
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
|
|
|
Source (book)
|
|
|
|
EASE '16 : proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, June 2016, Limerick, Ireland
|
|
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
New York, N.Y.
:
ACM
,
2016
|
|
|
ISBN
|
|
|
|
978-1-4503-3691-8
|
|
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1145/2915970.2915992
|
|
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
p. 1-10
|
|
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000540645400011
|
|
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
|
|
|
|
|
|