Publication
Title
Clash of the titans: a comparative approach to reform of judicial accountability in Egypt
Author
Abstract
This Article argues for the reform of judicial accountability rules in Egypt. The lack of a real separation of powers and checks and balances between the three powers often leads the judiciary to become a periphery in the executive body, rather than an independent authority that invigilates and monitors any violation of the law. Judges who refuse to comply with executive wishes are often subjected to persecution from the Ministry of Justice and its Judicial Inspection Department, which can reach up to the level of impeachment. The Ministry of Justice uses judicial accountability as a tool of retribution over disobedient and inconsistent judges. Currently, the executive authority monopolizes the judicial accountability process and its outcomes. Reformation towards a transparent democratic judiciary requires major participation by the public in the judicial accountability process. This participation aims not only to exclude the authority of the Ministry of Justice over the judiciary and the judges, but it also aims to increase public participation in a democratic judiciary.
Language
English
Source (journal)
Seattle University law review
Publication
2017
ISSN
1078-1927
Volume/pages
41:1(2017), p. 61-110
Full text (open access)
UAntwerpen
Faculty/Department
Research group
Publication type
Subject
Law 
Affiliation
Publications with a UAntwerp address
External links
Record
Identification
Creation 19.03.2018
Last edited 15.07.2021
To cite this reference