Title
|
|
|
|
Religion and the Exercise of Public Authority
| |
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
Abstract
|
|
|
|
A group of Canadian scholars from a variety of disciplines (law, religious studies, philosophy, social sciences, anthropology and theology) have produced a volume with the primary aim of exposing the legal and political assumptions underlying the concept of state neutrality and its limits as a governing ideal. The limits and assumptions of state neutrality are exposed and discussed by way of its interaction with religious diversity where it is most controversial – in public spaces and in the performance of public duties. This is done in eleven chapters that discuss the topic within various settings – the courtroom, the magistrate’s office, the hospital, the school, and the lawyer’s office. This interaction between religion and assumed notions of state neutrality can range from a public official wearing a religious symbol, to a public official refusing to register a civil union of a same-sex couple (based on the religious and conscientious objections of the official). As mentioned by the editors themselves: “These issues have exposed the difficulties engendered when civic officials engage with religion – both as a fact of social life and as an aspect of their own identities – while discharging their public responsibilities”. |
| |
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Tydskrif vir regswetenskap / Universiteit van die Oranje-Vrystaat. Fakulteit Regsgeleerdheid. - Bloemfontein, 1976, currens
| |
Publication
|
|
|
|
Bloemfontein
:
Fakulteit van Regsgeleerdheid, Universiteit van die Oranje-Vrystaat
,
2017
| |
ISSN
|
|
|
|
2415-0517
[online]
0258-252X
[print]
| |
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.18820/24150517/JJS42.V1.8
| |
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
42
:1
(2017)
, p. 139-147
| |
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|