Publication
Title
The comparative African economics of governance in fighting terrorism
Author
Abstract
This study assesses the comparative economics of governance in fighting terrorism in fifty-three African countries for period 1996-2012. Four terrorism variables are used: domestic, transnational, unclear, and total terrorism dynamics. Nine bundled and unbundled governance variables are employed: political stability (no violence), voice and accountability, political governance, government effectiveness, regulation quality, economic governance, corruption control, the rule of law, and institutional governance. The empirical evidence is based on fixed effects regressions. In the analytical procedure, we first bundle governance indicators by means of principal component analysis before engaging the empirical exercise with the full sample. In the final step, specifications are based on a decomposed full sample in order to articulate the fundamental characteristics for comparative purposes. The following broad findings are established. First, good governance is an appealing tool in fighting terrorism. Second, the relevance of the good governance dynamics is as follows in order of increasing relevance: economic governance, institutional governance, and political governance. The findings are presented in increasing order of magnitude to emphasize fundamental features in which governance dynamics have the highest effect in mitigating terrorism.
Language
English
Source (journal)
African security. - Philadelphia, Pa, 2008, currens
Publication
Philadelphia, Pa : 2018
ISSN
1939-2206 [print]
1939-2214 [online]
DOI
10.1080/19392206.2018.1560968
Volume/pages
11 :4 (2018) , p. 296-338
ISI
000471759600002
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
UAntwerpen
Faculty/Department
Research group
Publication type
Subject
Law 
Affiliation
Publications with a UAntwerp address
External links
VABB-SHW
Web of Science
Record
Identifier
Creation 01.08.2019
Last edited 25.04.2022
To cite this reference