|
Title
|
|
|
|
Unequal opportunities in science : expanding our perspectives
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| Scientific merit is commonly assessed through a researcher’s number of publications, or other citation metrics. However this procedure has been criticized as being biased, unfair and not representative of the true contribution of academic researchers to the advancement of science. Notably, citation metrics have been found to be detrimental to the assessment of female researchers’ achievement and maybe to women’s representation in academia. Yet very little is known about the real causes of differential gender representation in science. In this paper, I discuss these causes, and argue that recently proposed improvements in favour of more equal opportunities may instead generate other inequalities. I also anticipate that discriminative guidelines, if employed, should take other potentially disadvantaged communities into account and eventually promote communitarianism in science. I conclude that science as a whole has a lot more to gain by adopting a multi-dimensional, universal, and qualitative perspective when assessing scientific merit. |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Ideas in Ecology and Evolution
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
2013
| |
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1918-3178
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.4033/IEE.2013.6.13.F
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
6
:1
(2013)
, p. 52-55
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
| |
|