Title
|
|
|
|
A dosimetric comparison of real-time adaptive and non-adaptive radiotherapy: A multi-institutional study encompassing robotic, gimbaled, multileaf collimator and couch tracking
| |
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: A study of real-time adaptive radiotherapy systems was performed to test the hypothesis that, across delivery systems and institutions, the dosimetric accuracy is improved with adaptive treatments over non-adaptive radiotherapy in the presence of patient-measured tumor motion. Methods and materials: Ten institutions with robotic(2), gimbaled(2), MLC(4) or couch tracking(2) used common materials including CT and structure sets, motion traces and planning protocols to create a lung and a prostate plan. For each motion trace, the plan was delivered twice to a moving dosimeter; with and without real-time adaptation. Each measurement was compared to a static measurement and the percentage of failed points for gamma-tests recorded. Results: For all lung traces all measurement sets show improved dose accuracy with a mean 2%/2 mm gamma-fail rate of 1.6% with adaptation and 15.2% without adaptation (p < 0.001). For all prostate the mean 2%/2 mm gamma-fail rate was 1.4% with adaptation and 17.3% without adaptation (p < 0.001). The difference between the four systems was small with an average 2%/2 mm gamma-fail rate of <3% for all systems with adaptation for lung and prostate. Conclusions: The investigated systems all accounted for realistic tumor motion accurately and performed to a similar high standard, with real-time adaptation significantly outperforming non-adaptive delivery methods. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. |
| |
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Radiotherapy and oncology. - Amsterdam
| |
Publication
|
|
|
|
Amsterdam
:
2016
| |
ISSN
|
|
|
|
0167-8140
| |
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1016/J.RADONC.2016.03.006
| |
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
119
:1
(2016)
, p. 159-165
| |
ISI
|
|
|
|
000375822700028
| |
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|