|
Title
|
|
|
|
Redesigning an electrochemical MIP sensor for PFOS : practicalities and pitfalls
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| There is a growing interest in the technological transfer of highly performing electrochemical sensors within portable analytical devices for the in situ monitoring of environmental contaminants, such as perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). In the redesign of biomimetic sensors, many parameters should be taken into account from the working conditions to the electrode surface roughness. A complete characterization of the surface modifiers can help to avoid time-consuming optimizations and better interpret the sensor responses. In the present study, a molecularly imprinted polymer electrochemical sensor (MIP) for PFOS optimized on gold disk electrodes was redesigned on commercial gold screen-printed electrodes. However, its performance investigated by differential pulse voltammetry was found to be poor. Before proceeding with further optimization, a morphological study of the bare and modified electrode surfaces was carried out by scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and profilometry revealing an heterogeneous distribution of the polymer strongly influenced by the electrode roughness. The high content of fluorine of the target-template molecule allowed to map the distribution of the molecularly imprinted polymer before the template removal and to define a characterization protocol. This case study shows the importance of a multi-analytical characterization approach and identify significant parameters to be considered in similar redesigning studies. |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Sensors. - -
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
2019
| |
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1424-8220
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.3390/S19204433
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
19
:20
(2019)
, 13 p.
| |
|
Article Reference
|
|
|
|
4433
| |
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000497864700081
| |
|
Pubmed ID
|
|
|
|
31614913
| |
|
Medium
|
|
|
|
E-only publicatie
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
| |
|