|
Title
|
|
|
|
Principals and transceivers : regional authorities in EU trade negotiations
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| The EU conducts its external trade policy under close scrutiny by member-states. Yet, what about the role of regional authorities in federal states? To answer, we look at the principal-agent chain of delegation and explore to which extent regions with stakes and competencies in the matter exert control over EU policies. We distinguish three ideal-type roles regions can perform: principals in their own right, members of collective principals, and introduce the new concept of ‘transceivers’. A region can perform the role of principal with formal competencies, as does Flanders, which as one of multiple principals can withhold a Belgian decision. A region can also be one of a collective group of principals, as is the case for the region Hesse. Regions can finally perform the role of a ‘transceiver’ of information from policy-makers to constituencies (and vice versa), akin to the role of endorser, without formal framework for involvement – as does Scotland. Since regions and states alike depend on private sector information, two conclusions prevail. First, despite formal competencies, regions that are members of collective principals struggle becoming the sole interlocutor for the private sector. Second, despite lacking competencies, transceiver-regions are crucial interlocutors complementing member-state control over EU trade policy. |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Political Research Exchange
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
2020
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1080/2474736X.2020.1714454
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
2
:1
(2020)
, p. 1-20
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
| |
|