|
Title
|
|
|
|
Bioethical implications of end-of-life decision-making in patients with dementia: a tale of two societies
|
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| End-of-life decision-making in patients with dementia is a complex topic. Belgium and the Netherlands have been at the forefront of legislative advancement and progressive societal changes concerning the perspectives toward physician-assisted death (PAD). Careful consideration of clinical and social aspects is essential during the end-of-life decision-making process in patients with dementia. Geriatric assent provides the physician, the patient and his family the opportunity to end life with dignity. Unbearable suffering, decisional competence, and awareness of memory deficits are among the clinical considerations that physicians should incorporate during the end-of-life decision-making process. However, as other societies introduce legislature granting the right of PAD, new social determinants should be considered; Mexico City is an example. Current perspectives regarding advance euthanasia directives (AED) and PAD in patients with dementia are evolving. A new perspective that hinges on the role of the family and geriatric assent should help culturally heterogeneous societies in the transition of their public health care policies regarding end-of-life choices. |
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
|
|
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Monash bioethics review / Monash University. Centre for Human Bioethics. - Clayton, 1994, currens
|
|
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Clayton
:
Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics
,
2020
|
|
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1321-2753
[Print]
1836-6716
[Online]
|
|
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1007/S40592-020-00112-2
|
|
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
38
:1
(2020)
, p. 49-67
|
|
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000528650000002
|
|
|
Pubmed ID
|
|
|
|
32335862
|
|
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
|
|