|
Title
|
|
|
|
Hume's "Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals" and "The Whole Duty of Man"
|
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| I examine, in this paper, the contents of one of the most famous religious texts of the early modern period, The Whole Duty of Man, and I show that Hume's Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Man is an attempt to reappropriate and replace the Anglican devotional with his own moral philosophy. Hume would reject the devotional's general methodology, its claims about the foundation of morality, and its list of duties. However, a careful reading of The Whole Duty of Man reveals that Hume shares its author's evaluation of pride and humility, and its insistence on utility and pleasure. Hume, I argue, would not think of this book as mortifying or monkish. Given the popularity of The Whole Duty of Man and Hume's desire to push religion back into the closet together with his passion for literary fame, we have good reasons to conclude that Hume was more envious than critical, and that the EPM was his own remastered version of what could be called ‘The Whole Merit of Man’. |
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
|
|
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Journal of Scottish philosophy. - Edinburgh, 2003, currens
|
|
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Edinburgh
:
Edinburgh University Press
,
2020
|
|
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1479-6651
[print]
1755-2001
[online]
|
|
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.3366/JSP.2020.0263
|
|
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
18
:2
(2020)
, p. 117-132
|
|
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000600536800002
|
|
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
|
|
|
|
|
|