|
Title
|
|
|
|
Consequences of vertical basic wood density variation on the estimation of aboveground biomass with terrestrial laser scanning
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| Key message Stump-to-tip trends in basic wood density complicate the conversion of tree volume into aboveground biomass. We use 3D tree models from terrestrial laser scanning to obtain tree-level volume-weighted wood density. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) is used to generate realistic 3D tree models that enable a non-destructive way of quantifying tree volume. An accurate value for basic wood density is required to convert tree volume into aboveground biomass (AGB) for forest carbon assessments. However, basic density is characterised by high inter-, intra-species and within-tree variability and a likely source of error in TLS-derived biomass estimates. Here, 31 adult trees of 4 important European timber species (Fagus sylvatica, Larix decidua, Pinus sylvestris, Fraxinus excelsior) were scanned using TLS and then felled for several basic wood density measurements. We derived a reference volume-weighted basic density (rho(w)) by combining volume from 3D tree models with destructively assessed vertical density profiles. We compared this to basic density retrieved from a single basal disc over bark (rho(bd)), two perpendicular pith-to-bark increment cores at breast height (rho(ic)), and sourcing the best available local basic wood density from publications. Stump-to-tip trends in basic wood density caused site-average woody AGB estimation biases ranging from -3.3 to + 7.8% when using rho(bd) and from -4.1 to + 11.8% when using rho(ic). Basic wood density from publications was in general a bad predictor for rho(w) as the bias ranged from -3.2 to + 17.2%, with little consistency across different density repositories. Overall, our density-attributed biases were similar to several recently reported biases in TLS-derived tree volume, leading to potentially large compound errors in biomass assessments with TLS if patterns of vertical basic wood density variation are not properly accounted for. |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Trees: structure and function. - Berlin
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Heidelberg
:
Springer heidelberg
,
2021
| |
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
0931-1890
[print]
1432-2285
[online]
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1007/S00468-020-02067-7
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
35
(2021)
, p. 671-684
| |
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000604163700002
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
| |
|