Title
|
|
|
|
What's in a name? Political antagonism and critiquing 'neoliberalism'
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
The concept of neoliberalism has been central to critiques of the dominant social order over the last 20 years. The use of the term itself is often a focus of repetitive debates, between those who affirm its conceptual validity and those who highlight its vagueness. Informed by Laclau's concepts of antagonism and heterogeneity, this article offers a theoretical account of how the term is articulated, especially in left-wing discourses (including scholarly discourses) that prioritize neoliberalism as an object of critique. I affirm the use of neoliberalism as a critical shorthand for naming an oppressive social order, but also highlight the potential political and strategic problems with catch-all critiques of neoliberalism from within a radical left imaginary. I suggest another mode of critiquing neoliberalism that is cultivated through an ability to talk about how different social phenomena that might be one-dimensionally named as 'neoliberal' could be reconstituted in a coherent anti-neoliberal programme. |
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
|
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Journal of political ideologies. - Basingstoke
|
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Abingdon
:
Routledge journals, taylor & francis ltd
,
2022
|
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1356-9317
|
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1080/13569317.2021.1871801
|
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
27
:2
(2022)
, p. 148-167
|
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000607661600001
|
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
|
|
|
|
|
|