|
Title
|
|
|
|
National identity, constitutional identity, and sovereignty in the EU
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| This article challenges the assumption, widespread in European constitutional discourse, that ‘national identity’ and ‘constitutional identity’ can be used interchangeably. First, this essay demonstrates that the conflation of the two terms lacks grounding in a sound theory of legal interpretation. Second, it submits that the requirements of respect for national and constitutional identity, as articulated in the EU Treaty and in the case law of certain constitutional courts, respectively, rest on different normative foundations: fundamental principles of political morality versus a claim to State sovereignty. Third, it is argued that the Treaty-makers had good reasons for writing into the EU Treaty a requirement of respect for the Member States’ national identities rather than the States’ sovereignty, or their constitutional identity. |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Netherlands journal of legal philosophy. - Den Haag, 2012, currens
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Den Haag
:
2016
| |
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
2213-0713
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.5553/NJLP/.000049
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
45
:2
(2016)
, p. 82-98
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|