|
Title
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the determinants for positive and negative affect proposed by appraisal theories, goal-directed theories, and predictive processing theories
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| The determinants of affect proposed by the appraisal theory, the goal-directed theory, and the predictive processing theory are compared. The first theory attaches a role to multiple factors (goal-related factors, expectation-related factors, and control), the second theory only focuses on goal-related factors, and the third theory only focuses on expectation-related factors. We hold each of the theories against the light of (some) empirical evidence and examine whether the increase in parsimony of the second and third theories comes at a cost of scope or whether there are ways around it. |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. - -
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
2021
| |
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
2352-1546
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1016/J.COBEHA.2021.03.015
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
39
(2021)
, p. 147-152
| |
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000664653700024
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|