Title
|
|
|
|
Lung cancer screening : intention to participate and acceptability among Belgian smokers
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Objective Next to the obvious benefits of tobacco-use cessation, lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans has been proposed as a means to lower lung cancer burden. Achieving an impact of any cancer screening program on cancer-specific mortality largely depends on the uptake. The aim of this study was to estimate the acceptability and intention to participate in a lung cancer screening program among Belgian current or former smokers. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was carried out among adults from the Belgian population. Sampling took place within an existing online panel. Results In total, 83.6% of all respondents (n = 2727), including current or former smokers and never smokers, believed that offering lung cancer screening to current or former smokers is a good idea. 84.3% of all current or former smokers (n = 1534) answered that they would likely or very likely participate in a screening program for lung cancer. The majority of current smokers that were willing to be screened said they would also want to receive tobacco-use cessation counseling in parallel with screening (71.8%; n = 486), whereas 9% (n = 61) would decline. Conclusions These findings suggest that a Belgian lung cancer screening program would be acceptable and could be well-attended by current or former smokers. Further research should focus on how smokers can be best reached to propose screening, and how tobacco-use cessation counseling can be successfully integrated in a lung cancer screening program. |
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
|
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
European journal of cancer prevention. - Oxford, 1991, currens
|
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Oxford
:
2021
|
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
0959-8278
[print]
1473-5709
[online]
|
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000656
|
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
30
:6
(2021)
, p. 457-461
|
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000704209800006
|
|
Pubmed ID
|
|
|
|
33369949
|
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
|
|