|
Title
|
|
|
|
Paediatric Strategy Forum for medicinal product development of DNA damage response pathway inhibitors in children and adolescents with cancer : ACCELERATE in collaboration with the European Medicines Agency with participation of the Food and Drug Administration
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| DNA damage response inhibitors have a potentially important therapeutic role in paediatric cancers; however, their optimal use, including patient selection and combination strategy, remains unknown. Moreover, there is an imbalance between the number of drugs with diverse mechanisms of action and the limited number of paediatric patients available to be en-rolled in early-phase trials, so prioritisation and a strategy are essential. While PARP inhibitors targeting homologous recombination-deficient tumours have been used primarily in the treatment of adult cancers with BRCA1/2 mutations, BRCA1/2 mutations occur infrequently in childhood tumours, and therefore, a specific response hypothesis is required. Combinations with targeted radiotherapy, ATR inhibitors, or antibody drug conjugates with DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor -related warheads warrant evaluation. Additional monotherapy trials of PARP inhibitors with the same mechanism of action are not recommended. PARP1-specific inhibitors and PARP inhibitors with very good central nervous system penetration also deserve evaluation. ATR, ATM, DNA-PK, CHK1, WEE1, DNA polymerase theta and PKMYT1 inhibitors are early in paediatric development. There should be an overall coordinated strategy for their development. Therefore, an academia/industry consensus of the relevant biomarkers will be established and a focused meeting on ATR inhibitors (as proof of principle) held. CHK1 inhibitors have demonstrated activity in desmoplastic small round cell tumours and have a potential role in the treatment of other paediatric malignancies, such as neuroblastoma and Ewing sarcoma. Access to CHK1 in-hibitors for paediatric clinical trials is a high priority. The three key elements in evaluating these inhibitors in children are (1) innovative trial design (design driven by a clear hypothesis with the intent to further investigate responders and non-responders with detailed retrospective molecular analyses to generate a revised or new hypothesis); (2) biomarker selection and (3) rational com-bination therapy, which is limited by overlapping toxicity. To maximally benefit children with cancer, investigators should work collaboratively to learn the lessons from the past and apply them to future studies. Plans should be based on the relevant biology, with a focus on simulta-neous and parallel research in preclinical and clinical settings, and an overall integrated and collaborative strategy. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
European journal of cancer. - Oxford, 1990, currens
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Oxford
:
Elsevier sci ltd
,
2023
| |
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
0959-8049
[print]
1879-0852
[online]
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1016/J.EJCA.2023.112950
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
190
(2023)
, p. 1-24
| |
|
Article Reference
|
|
|
|
112950
| |
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
001046606500001
| |
|
Pubmed ID
|
|
|
|
37441939
| |
|
Medium
|
|
|
|
E-only publicatie
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Full text (open access)
|
|
|
|
| |
|