Publication
Title
Peer-reviewing processes and incentives : data management community survey results
Author
Abstract
Reviewing papers for conferences is an important and hard task that brings several challenges. The Data Management community has been increasingly struggling with high reviewer load, low-quality reviews and low reviewer engagement, unethical reviewing practices as well as undeclared and under-declared conflicts of interest. In this article, we report the results of a survey we conducted to gather the opinion of the Data Management community regarding what could be done to address these challenges. We reached out to about 1,200 members of the data management community with relevant reviewing experience and collected 345 anonymous responses. We plan to follow up with a subsequent report, discussing in more depth particular proposals, inspired by the collective feedback from the community.
Language
English
Source (journal)
ACM SIGMOD record. - New York, N.Y.
Publication
New York, N.Y. : 2023
ISSN
0163-5808
DOI
10.1145/3641832.3641844
Volume/pages
52 :4 (2023) , p. 41-46
ISI
001153252100005
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
Full text (open access)
The author-created version that incorporates referee comments and is the accepted for publication version Available from 19.07.2024
Full text (publisher's version - intranet only)
UAntwerpen
Faculty/Department
Research group
Publication type
Subject
Affiliation
Publications with a UAntwerp address
External links
Web of Science
Record
Identifier
Creation 04.03.2024
Last edited 18.03.2024
To cite this reference