|
Title
|
|
|
|
The contingency of intermedia agenda-setting: a longitudinal study in Belgium
|
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| This large-scale study investigates how intermedia agenda-setting effects are moderated by five factors: (1) lag length; (2) medium type, (3) language/institutional barriers; (4) issue type, and (5) election or non-election con text. Longitudinal analyses of daily attention to twenty-five issues in nine Belgian media across eight years demonstrate that (1) intermedia agenda setting is mainly a short-term process; (2) newspapers have stronger influence on television than vice versa; (3) language/institutional barriers suppress influence, (4) size of influence differs across types of issues; and (5) intermedia agenda setting is largely absent during election times. |
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
|
|
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Journalism and mass communication quarterly / AEJMC. - Columbia, S.C., 1995, currens
|
|
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
Columbia, S.C.
:
Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
,
2008
|
|
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1077-6990
[print]
2161-430X
[online]
|
|
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1177/107769900808500409
|
|
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
85
:4
(2008)
, p. 860-877
|
|
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000264985700009
|
|
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
|
|