Title
Measurement and reporting of burden of disease for hepatitis A: results of the EUROHEP.NET feasibility surveyMeasurement and reporting of burden of disease for hepatitis A: results of the EUROHEP.NET feasibility survey
Author
Contributor
van Damme, P.
Author
Contributor
et al.
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Research group
Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO)
Publication type
article
Publication
Oxford,
Subject
Human medicine
Source (journal)
European journal of public health. - Oxford
Volume/pages
17(2007):1, p. 69-74
ISSN
1101-1262
ISI
000243992700017
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Abstract
Background: European countries use a wide variety of surveillance systems and prevention measures for viral hepatitis. Each system is adapted to the local situation and an overview was never mapped out at European level. The EUROHEP.NET Project is a European Commission-funded feasibility study for a future network on surveillance and prevention of vaccine-preventable hepatitis. We analysed the measurement and reporting of burden of disease for hepatitis A (HA) and B (HB) in the participating countries. Methods: Twenty-eight countries were invited to participate in this study. An online survey was available from the projects website (www.eurohep.net). The questions concerned the organisation of the surveillance system, case definition, burden of disease, epidemiology, and vaccination strategies. The responses on data sources and the numeric data related to burden of disease for HA for the period 19972001 were analysed. Results: Twenty-two countries completed the survey for hepatitis A. Data on total number of hospitalisations and deaths were available from 17 and 18 countries, respectively, although sometimes not complete. Data on hospitalisation days, number of liver transplants and proportion of these due to HAV were often not available. Conclusion: Surveillance systems on burden of disease for hepatitis A show a wide diversity among the participating countries. The introduction of a standardised system of data collection at the European Union level according to ICD-10 but respecting the local current practices is a primary need, especially for data that should be collected in all countries, like hospitalisation and mortality. A link to surveillance databases is also strongly recommended.
E-info
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/iruaauth/25c369/2265317325b.pdf
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000243992700017&DestLinkType=RelatedRecords&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000243992700017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000243992700017&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848