Title
Psychopathology among children and adolescents in child welfare: a comparison across different types of placement in Flanders, Belgium Psychopathology among children and adolescents in child welfare: a comparison across different types of placement in Flanders, Belgium
Author
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Publication type
article
Publication
London ,
Subject
Human medicine
Source (journal)
Journal of epidemiology and community health / British Medical Association. - London
Volume/pages
64(2010) :4 , p. 353-359
ISSN
0143-005X
ISI
000276032900015
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Affiliation
University of Antwerp
Abstract
Background: Children and adolescents in child welfare are characterized by a high rate of psychopathology. However, prevalence estimates vary greatly and comparisons between studies are limited owing to different target populations, measurement tools and how results are presented. In addition, little is known about the situation of children under child welfare care still living with their parents. Methods: The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), used to measure psychopathology, were administered to parent, agency carer and adolescent (if older than 11). Data of 292 children aged 3-17 (mean age: 12.13) with at least one respondent of four types of placement, namely, foster care, residential care, day care and home based care, were included (response rate: 78%). Socio-economic characteristics and psychopathology were examined across these four types of placement. Results: Overall, the proportion of children scoring within the clinical range according to at least one informant was 56% according to the SDQ and 54% according to the ASEBA. Rates were highest among children living at home and significantly lower among children in out-of-home placement, even after correcting for age, income, and duration of the ongoing placement. Adolescents scored themselves lower on psychopathology in comparison to their parents and the agency carer. Conclusions: The prevalence of psychopathology in this child welfare population was very high, however the findings were consistent with results obtained in previous studies. The prevalence estimates differed depending on the type of placement: the highest rates were found among children in home based care, children in foster care suffered less psychopathology. The findings stress the vulnerable mental status of children in child welfare and the need for additional support for child welfare professionals and children, as well as their parents, especially for those living with their parents.
E-info
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000276032900015&DestLinkType=RelatedRecords&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000276032900015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000276032900015&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
Handle