Title
An open-label, randomized, multicenter study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6/11/16/18) vaccine given concomitantly with diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliomyelitis vaccine in healthy adolescents 11 to 17 years of age An open-label, randomized, multicenter study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6/11/16/18) vaccine given concomitantly with diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliomyelitis vaccine in healthy adolescents 11 to 17 years of age
Author
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Publication type
article
Publication
Baltimore, Md ,
Subject
Human medicine
Source (journal)
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
The pediatric infectious disease journal. - Baltimore, Md
Volume/pages
29(2010) :4 , p. 314-318
ISSN
0891-3668
ISI
000276565600006
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Affiliation
University of Antwerp
Abstract
Background: GARDASIL/SILGARD is a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine with activity against HPV 6/11/16/18. In many countries, GARDASIL is recommended for routine use among adolescents at the same age as other vaccines. In this study, we evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of GARDASIL administered concomitantly with REPEVAX (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and poliomyelitis vaccine). Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, multicenter study. We enrolled males (n = 260) and females (n = 583) aged 11 to 17 years. All subjects received a 0.5 mL dose of GARDASIL at day 1, month 2, and month 6, and a 0.5 mL dose of REPEVAX either on day 1 (opposite limb from GARDASIL) or at month 1. Antibody levels for all vaccine components were measured. We monitored systemic and injection-site adverse experiences (AEs) and serious adverse experiences. Results: Immune response for all GARDASIL antigens following concomitant administration of the vaccines was demonstrated noninferior to nonconcomitant administration. Seroconversion for HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 was >99.7% in both concomitant and nonconcomitant vaccination groups. For REPEVAX, noninferiority of immune response was established for diphtheria, tetanus, and all polio and pertussis antigens. Concomitant administration of the 2 vaccines was generally well-tolerated, although there was a small increase in headache and injection-site swelling in the concomitant group. Conclusion: Overall, concomitant administration of GARDASIL and REPEVAX was generally well-tolerated and did not interfere with the immune response to either vaccine. Concomitant administration of vaccines would minimize the number of visits required to deliver each vaccine individually.
E-info
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/iruaauth/c12982/dd72949e80b.pdf
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000276565600006&DestLinkType=RelatedRecords&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000276565600006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000276565600006&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
Handle