Title
Establishing a European research agenda on "gut feelings" in general practice: a qualitative study using the nominal group technique Establishing a European research agenda on "gut feelings" in general practice: a qualitative study using the nominal group technique
Author
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Publication type
article
Publication
Amersfoort ,
Subject
Human medicine
Source (journal)
The European journal of general practice. - Amersfoort
Volume/pages
16(2010) :2 , p. 75-79
ISSN
1381-4788
1751-1402
ISI
000298279300005
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Affiliation
University of Antwerp
Abstract
Objective: Although gut feelings are perceived as playing a substantial role in the diagnostic reasoning of the general practitioner (GP), there is little evidence about their diagnostic and prognostic value. Consensus on both types of gut feelings (a sense of alarm, a sense of reassurance) has enabled us to operationalize the concept. As a next step we wanted to identify research questions that are considered relevant to validate the concept of gut feelings and to estimate its usefulness for daily practice and medical education. Moreover, we were interested in the study designs considered appropriate to study these research questions. Methods: The nominal group technique (NGT) is a qualitative research method of judgmental decision-making involving four phases: generating ideas, recording them, evaluation and prioritization. Dutch and Belgian academics whose subject is general practice (n = 18), attended one of three meetings during which NGT was used to produce a research agenda on gut feelings. Results: NGT yielded ten research questions and nine corresponding appropriate designs on four topics, i.e. the diagnostic value of gut feelings, the validation of its determinants, the opportunities for integrating gut feelings in medical education and a rest group. The study designs respectively included recording and follow-up of gut feelings, video recording of consultations with stimulated recall using simulated and real patients respectively, analysing trainees consultation stories and videos, linguistic analyses, and vignette studies. Furthermore, two experimental designs were proposed. Conclusion: A European research agenda on gut feelings in general practice has been established and could be used in collaborative research.
E-info
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/iruaauth/06715b/4995aad15bf.pdf
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000298279300005&DestLinkType=RelatedRecords&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000298279300005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000298279300005&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
Handle