Title
Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers; part 1: technical specifications Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers; part 1: technical specifications
Author
Faculty/Department
Faculty of Sciences. Physics
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Publication type
article
Publication
Fairfax, Va ,
Subject
Human medicine
Source (journal)
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. - Fairfax, Va
Volume/pages
31(2005) :6 , p. 1114-1127
ISSN
0886-3350
ISI
000230982800015
Carrier
E
Target language
English (eng)
Full text (Publishers DOI)
Affiliation
University of Antwerp
Abstract
Setting Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Methods A number of technical and practical parameters are listed for the Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey), the OPD-scan (ARK 10000; Nidek), the Zywave (Bausch & Lomb), the WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec), the MultiSpot Hartmann-Shack device, and the Allegretto Wave Analyzer including working principles, data acquisition, aberrometer alignment, wavefront calculation, and data analysis. Operator and patient comfort as well as practical advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Conclusion All devices met at least half the following parameters: alignment, correction for source wavelength, data averaging, measurement quality check, and inhibition of accommodation.
E-info
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000230982800015&DestLinkType=RelatedRecords&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000230982800015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000230982800015&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=ef845e08c439e550330acc77c7d2d848
Handle