|
Title
|
|
|
|
Power sharing and transitional justice : a clash of paradigms?
| |
|
Author
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
| Recent peace negotiations practice has given rise to the emergence of two paradigms. In line with normative developments in global human rights protection, internationally brokered peace processes often address the options for accountability for abuses committed in the past and generally cannot include blanket amnesties. At the same time, many agreements end armed conflicts by offering power-sharing incentives for warring parties. In most cases, power-sharing arrangements are likely to clash with attempts to meaningfully deal with truth, accountability, and reparation for past abuses. The tension between the two paradigms gives rise to a number of important challenges and constraints for policymakers and, thus far, there is little practical evidence to guide them in managing the clash. |
| |
|
Language
|
|
|
|
English
| |
|
Source (journal)
|
|
|
|
Global governance. - -
| |
|
Publication
|
|
|
|
2011
| |
|
ISSN
|
|
|
|
1075-2846
| |
|
DOI
|
|
|
|
10.1163/19426720-01704006
| |
|
Volume/pages
|
|
|
|
17
:4
(2011)
, p. 489-505
| |
|
ISI
|
|
|
|
000298029100006
| |
|
Full text (Publisher's DOI)
|
|
|
|
| |
|