A comparison of partial profile designs for discrete choice experiments with an application in software developmentA comparison of partial profile designs for discrete choice experiments with an application in software development
Faculty of Applied Economics
Research group
Engineering Management
Publication type
Antwerp :UA, [*]
Source (series)
Research paper / Faculty of Applied Economics ; 2012:004
44 p.
Target language
English (eng)
University of Antwerp
In a discrete choice experiment, each respondent chooses the best product or service sequentially from many groups or choice sets of alternative goods. The alternatives, called pro¯les, are described by level combinations from a set of prede¯ned attri- butes. Respondents sometimes make their choices on the basis of only one dominant attribute rather than making trade-o®s among all the attributes. For example, in studies involving price as an attribute, respondents may always choose the pro¯le with the lowest price. Also, a choice task including many attributes may encourage respondent decisions that are not fully compensatory. To thwart these behaviors, the investigator can hold the levels of some of the attributes constant in every choice set. The resulting designs are called partial pro¯le designs. In this paper, we construct D-optimal partial pro¯le designs for estimating main-e®ects models. We use a Bayesian design algorithm that integrates the D-optimality criterion over a prior distribution of likely parameter values. To determine the constant attributes in each choice set, we provide three alternative generalizations of an approach that makes use of balanced incomplete block designs. Each of our three generalizations constructs partial pro¯le designs accommodating attributes with any number of le- vels and allowing °exibility in the numbers of choice sets and constant attributes. We show results from an actual experiment in software development performed using one of these algorithms. Finally, we compare the algorithms with respect to their statistical e±ciency and ability to avoid failures due to the presence of a dominant attribute.
Full text (open access)